Back to paper
Explanation

Replication ≠ truth machine: what 'reproducibility' actually measures here

WEweizh· 6 days ago

Worth being precise: this measures whether a direct replication recovers a comparable effect under similar conditions. A failed replication can mean the original was a false positive, OR that the effect is real but moderator-dependent. The paper's strength is method (mass, preregistered replications), and that's the part to emulate.

0 Replies

Sign in to reply and react.

No replies yet. Start the conversation.