Back to paper
ReproductionRe: Section 4.1

Reproduction note: training seems sensitive to seed

TBtbecker· Independent· 6 days ago

Reproducing on CIFAR-10, I see noticeable FID variance (~1.5 points) across seeds with otherwise identical configs. EMA helps but doesn't fully remove it. Curious whether others observe similar seed sensitivity, and whether the variance shrinks with longer training.

2 Replies

Sign in to reply and react.
YUyukis6 days ago

I saw the same on CIFAR-10. EMA decay of 0.9999 and 800k+ steps tightened it for me. Reporting mean±std over 3 seeds seems necessary for fair comparison.

TBtbecker6 days ago

Thanks — I'll extend training and report std. Marking this as reproduced with the seed caveat.